Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Dark Reign: Rise of the Norman Empire
Topic Started: Jun 9 2009, 04:46 AM (365 Views)
Gabriel Zero
Member Avatar
Administrator
A Goblin with a muthafucking gun...

The Secret Invasion is over; the Skrulls lost, Humanity won. Well to be honest, Norman Osborn won, we're just going to deal with it. This is his Dark Reign.

The Books

Comics waving the Dark Reign banner (so far to May 2009) are:

* Agents of Atlas #1-5
* Amazing Spider-Man #595-599
* Avengers: The Initiative #20-24
* Black Panther #1-4
* Dark Avengers #1-5
* Dark Reign: The Cabal
* Dark Reign: Elektra #1-5
* Dark Reign: Fantastic Four #1-5
* Dark Reign: Hawkeye #1-5
* Dark Reign: The Hood #1-5
* Dark Reign: Made Men #1-5
* Dark Reign: New Nation
* Dark Reign: Young Avengers #1-5
* Deadpool #6-10
* Invincible Iron Man #8-13
* Marvel Spotlight: Dark Reign
* Mighty Avengers #21-25
* Ms. Marvel #34-39
* New Avengers #48-53
* New Avengers: The Reunion #1-4
* Punisher #1-5
* Secret Invasion: Dark Reign
* Secret Invasion: Requiem
* Secret Warriors #1-4
* Skrull Kill Krew #1-2
* Spider-Woman #1-2
* Thunderbolts #128-132
* Uncanny X-Men Annual #2
* War Machine #1-5
* Wolverine: Origins #33-36
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gorvar
Member Avatar
Self claimed fanfic critic.
A super villian who killed people publicy in the past, suddenly gets a lot of power thanks to playing his cards well and the gullabilty of the Americain public?
I swear i've seen that somewhere before....
Probebly nothing.

Spoiler: click to toggle


I like the Norman Osborn charecture dont get me wrong, but his rise to power it's just...wow, the Marvel Americains have that one coming like Wonder Man said.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ace
Member Avatar
Samurai
It's really not that unbelievable at all. Norman has had more than a few instances where he's been seen in public while the Goblin attacked him. Most he set up himself. And in fact there have been many Goblins over the years, all of which could easily have been behind the mask for the majority of the instances. The general public have no way of knowing it was really Norman (and Harry) for most of it.

In fact, Norman has only been publicly seen as the Goblin on two occasions, and they weren't even that terrible. Once when Luke Cage smashed his car and he flew out in full Goblin gear and was arrested (in The Pulse). And again not long after that when he escaped police custody and Spider-Man kicked the ever-luvin' crud out of him (In the first issue of Marvel Knights: Spider-Man).

Outside of those two instances, he can write off the other Goblin appearances as different people (and he in fact alludes to this in his recent Dark Avengers interview, which actually isn't far from the truth some of the time).

And this isn't the first time he's gotten around this. Years ago Ben Urich wrote a book about the information he collected regarding the lives of Norman and Harry as Green Goblins. When Norman "returned from the dead" he sued Urich and the Daily Bugle for slander as they had no hard evidence to back that up.

Norman Osborn is a manipulator. All of his schemes are grandiose Machiavellian plots that have him pulling peoples strings from the shadows. He's an evil mastermind the likes of which most people in the Marvel universe have never seen. He has the money, the intelligence, and the influence to easily write off such charges. And he made the right move by confessing to a few instances while suggesting that the other times either weren't him, or he was being "taken advantage of".

No one can prove him wrong.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Templedog
Member Avatar
X-Men Chronologist
Ace
Jun 11 2009, 12:19 AM
It's really not that unbelievable at all. Norman has had more than a few instances where he's been seen in public while the Goblin attacked him. Most he set up himself. And in fact there have been many Goblins over the years, all of which could easily have been behind the mask for the majority of the instances. The general public have no way of knowing it was really Norman (and Harry) for most of it.

In fact, Norman has only been publicly seen as the Goblin on two occasions, and they weren't even that terrible. Once when Luke Cage smashed his car and he flew out in full Goblin gear and was arrested (in The Pulse). And again not long after that when he escaped police custody and Spider-Man kicked the ever-luvin' crud out of him (In the first issue of Marvel Knights: Spider-Man).

Outside of those two instances, he can write off the other Goblin appearances as different people (and he in fact alludes to this in his recent Dark Avengers interview, which actually isn't far from the truth some of the time).

And this isn't the first time he's gotten around this. Years ago Ben Urich wrote a book about the information he collected regarding the lives of Norman and Harry as Green Goblins. When Norman "returned from the dead" he sued Urich and the Daily Bugle for slander as they had no hard evidence to back that up.

Norman Osborn is a manipulator. All of his schemes are grandiose Machiavellian plots that have him pulling peoples strings from the shadows. He's an evil mastermind the likes of which most people in the Marvel universe have never seen. He has the money, the intelligence, and the influence to easily write off such charges. And he made the right move by confessing to a few instances while suggesting that the other times either weren't him, or he was being "taken advantage of".

No one can prove him wrong.
I think Dr. Doom is far more dangerous. Years ago Wizard magazine did a top list of the most Dangerous villians in Comicdom and Lex Luthor and Dr. Doom were #2 and #1 respectively.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ace
Member Avatar
Samurai
Doom and Osborn actually aren't that far apart. They're both geniuses who've dabbled in magic, who generally focus on two things: their own wants and goals, and making the lives of their enemies miserable.

In the case of both Doom and Osborn most of their plans are designed purely to make Spider-Man (and the Fantastic Four, in Doom's case) suffer as much as possible. Both go to great lengths not merely to kill their respective foes, but to break them emotionally and psychologically. Each has plans on top of plans on top of plans for such things.

They've also both contributed to global superterrorism. Latveria was funding it and outfitting superhumans with the tech necessary to keep them running, and Osborn has been part of a movement within the government to manufacture superhumans in order to keep superheroes busy so they focus on fighting each other rather than moving on to things like politics. Which ironically he did himself, overstepping a system he helped create.

And finally, they both have empires. Osborn with his companies, cults, dark superhero teams, and HAMMER. And Doom with his kingdom, which speaks for itself. Both have wealth and power, clearly. So in that way they're generally on equal footing. The difference is where Doom is prideful, Osborn is merely insane.

The reason the Green Goblin doesn't make it to the top of a lot of villain lists is because while he is all of what I stated above, until recently he was just a Spider-Man villain. That's all that he was. He never attacked the Avengers, the Fantastic Four or the X-Men; just Spider-Man. With Dark Reign that has all changed. Now he's a global villain, everyone is his enemy. So in the future I suspect we'll see him ranked much higher on such lists. Previously he was an A-list villain to comic fans, but now he's also an A-list villain in the context of the Marvel universe and how they perceive him.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Templedog
Member Avatar
X-Men Chronologist
Ace
Jun 11 2009, 02:10 PM
Doom and Osborn actually aren't that far apart. They're both geniuses who've dabbled in magic, who generally focus on two things: their own wants and goals, and making the lives of their enemies miserable.

In the case of both Doom and Osborn most of their plans are designed purely to make Spider-Man (and the Fantastic Four, in Doom's case) suffer as much as possible. Both go to great lengths not merely to kill their respective foes, but to break them emotionally and psychologically. Each has plans on top of plans on top of plans for such things.

They've also both contributed to global superterrorism. Latveria was funding it and outfitting superhumans with the tech necessary to keep them running, and Osborn has been part of a movement within the government to manufacture superhumans in order to keep superheroes busy so they focus on fighting each other rather than moving on to things like politics. Which ironically he did himself, overstepping a system he helped create.

And finally, they both have empires. Osborn with his companies, cults, dark superhero teams, and HAMMER. And Doom with his kingdom, which speaks for itself. Both have wealth and power, clearly. So in that way they're generally on equal footing. The difference is where Doom is prideful, Osborn is merely insane.

The reason the Green Goblin doesn't make it to the top of a lot of villain lists is because while he is all of what I stated above, until recently he was just a Spider-Man villain. That's all that he was. He never attacked the Avengers, the Fantastic Four or the X-Men; just Spider-Man. With Dark Reign that has all changed. Now he's a global villain, everyone is his enemy. So in the future I suspect we'll see him ranked much higher on such lists. Previously he was an A-list villain to comic fans, but now he's also an A-list villain in the context of the Marvel universe and how they perceive him.
Well, that was the point back when the Wizard Magazine list was made up Norman was barely a blip on the radar. In the article for each successive villian they would explain how the more dangerous supervillian would defeat the one before him. In the explaination of a battle between Dr. Doom and Lex Luthor the writers explained that the contest between the two would not be an easy one. It was summized that the plot would have more twists, turns, and subterfuge than one could safely imagine, but that Doctor Doom would eventually win.

I can only guess that nowadays that the battle would unfold similarily between Norman and Victor. Add Lex luthor into the mix and that is a trio i would want to stay away from.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gabriel Zero
Member Avatar
Administrator
To back up my opinion on the main site, I would like to say I agree with Ace.

If I analyzed how unrealistic a comic book is , I wouldn't buy them anymore. I don't have a problem if people invest in these imaginary stories for the sole purpose of complaining or writing negative reviews about them every single weeks. However the reason I purchase them is because I enjoy understanding the world and accepting it for what it is. Fictional entertainment.

I came to the acceptance that these stories will always be flawed. And just because they don't hold up to the standards of the reality we live in, it doesn't mean all of us are bothered or annoyed by those details. I feel compelled to voice my opinion that I feel some of these stories are held to unreasonably high standards. Don't confuse my point of view as someone who isn't unable to accept difference of opinion. I'm only voicing my own way of enjoying books I spend way too much money on.

On that note if a Comic Book Writer goes on twitter to back up his own story then kudos to him. I don't give the credit to the fans who write him hate mail every week. Some of those people who write hate mail are jerks who can't handle their own life, so they feel compelled to blame comic book writers for their own miserable existence. Notice how I said some, once again this is not a personal attack on anyone on the forum. However I do think there are people who cling to every little word in a comic (lets use Old Man Logan as a example.) And expect it to magically change their lives and teach them the secret of the universe.

Those kind of fans piss me the hell off and yes I feel justified in feeling the way I do. Just like anyone else in this forum may feel justified for their own difference of opinion. If revolving my life around being pissed 24/7 at some comic book writer is the right way to enjoy comics, then I'm proud to say I am loving enjoying comics the wrong fucking way. And one more time I'm going to say this has nothing to do with anyone on the forum. I'm just displaying my own personal frustrations I've accumulated from my years of experience on various comic book forums. So don't bother taking what I am saying to heart.

Last I checked Bendis must be doing something right if his books are selling well every month. That must mean a great deal of people are sticking with the book. Does this mean everyone should enjoy this book as much as I do? No. That is not what I am saying at all and that is not the point of this post. The point is that, I as a fan am in disagreement with the concept of buying a title you see no redeemable qualities in. If you are this way then that is your choice , however I am entitled to still my own opinion and point of view. I don't expect anyone else to agree with me.

Just clarifying that. =) Don't misconstrue my voice as a personal attack please. Thanks.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Major Marvel Universe Events · Next Topic »
Add Reply